Friday, January 23, 2009

The Meaning of Obama.


Barack H. Obama is now the President of the United States of America. For thousands of Americans, this means more than just a pretty new face in the White House. They believe that the Obama administration will fundamentally transform the character of our Nation. In the minds of these starry-eyed followers, Barack Obama's America will be a wondrous place where teenagers reject apathy, divisive political arguments are banished to the nether-world, marriages are strong, and public broadcasting is enjoyed and beloved by all.

It's a nice dream. It's also sheer nonsense.

When you wake up tomorrow, you probably won't be thinking of Obama's smiling face, and how swell it is that he wants to reach across the aisle. If your mind is running at all, it's far more likely to be focused on the concept of syrup-drenched waffles, and the deliciousness thereof. Soon enough, your daily routine will kick in, and you'll continue to live your life much as you did four months ago.

You'll work.
You'll talk with friends.
You'll spend too much time on YouTube.

If you happen to be the kind of person who volunteers at soup kitchens, participates in canned-food drives, and attends community meetings, you will keep on doing so. If you're a disengaged citizen who thinks that homeless people are worthless junkies, and enjoys kicking small animals, you'll stay on your dark path. The man who happens to occupy the White House doesn't even enter into the equation of your everyday choices.

This isn't to say that people can't change. They can. But speaking in a broad sense, personal change is a gradual process that originates from two main sources: our contact with God, and our contact with those who are closest to us.

Contrary to popular belief, Obama is not divine. And no matter how friendly he may look, Obama is not your friend. If given the opportunity, he probably wouldn't even want to hang out with you. It's true that Obama's inspirational speeches provide millions with an emotional high, but a surge of emotion is hardly enough to spark genuine change in an individual. In order for one man to change another, the element of regular, personal contact has to be present. The human mind is a collection of rigid patterns that can only be altered with the introduction of new, more powerful patterns. Watching a nice man talk about hope on TV hardly does the trick. 

However, Obama and his supporters can't be blamed for the faulty notion of the President's transformative power. Every four years, voters fall hard for the big lie of American politics: the notion that the President has the power to control the culture of our Nation.

Conservative icon Barry Goldwater pioneered the concept of placing "the social issue" at the center of a presidential campaign. He didn't just propose a set of policies; he promised moral renewal, and a return to a simpler time of tradition and order. While Goldwater's pitch was unsuccessful, Nixon, Reagan and Dubya used similar themes to appeal to the country. Even Bill Clinton called on his fellow Americans to "take more responsibility" for their families and communities. Ultimately, each of these presidents did change the country -- but almost solely in the realm of policy. The cultural fabric of America travelled on its own trajectory, one that politicians could neither predict nor control.

If America is a different place in 2012, there may be some things that Obama can take credit (or be blamed) for. After all, the President can have a profound effect on things like the economy, and America's relationship with the rest of the world. On the other hand, the attitudes, habits, and beliefs of 300 million individuals can't be altered with an executive order. Life goes on, regardless of whether there's a Bush or an Obama in the Oval Office. 


Real change happens. 
But it doesn't come from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. 

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

The Rick Warren Nontroversy.


It's been almost a month since Obama announced that evangelical megastar Rick Warren would deliver his inaugural invocation. Some people are still mad. But what exactly are they mad about?

Most of Rick Warren's detractors cite his conservative views on gay marriage, including his support for California's proposition 8, as well as his religious beliefs concerning the immorality of homosexual behavior. For many liberal Democrats, these views are simply beyond the realm of acceptability. They applaud Obama's incessant talk of bridging the divide between the right and the left, but offering the spotlight to a "divisive bigot" like Rick Warren is apparently a bridge too far.

Outside of the liberal bubble, things look a little different. While gay marriage is a polarizing issue, it's far less polarizing than many assume. In contrast to the recent failures of two ballot initiatives banning abortion in conservative South Dakota, gay marriage bans have been almost universally successful in states across America. And as proposition 8's victory in deep-blue California proves, opponents of gay marriage aren't defined by party lines. In many cases, America's diversity works to the disadvantage of the "gay rights" lobby. Members of racial minorities may vote overwhelmingly for Democratic candidates, but many hold the same conservative views on homosexuality and gay marriage that white evangelicals like Rick Warren espouse.

Same-sex marriage certainly doesn't face same-sect opposition.

But you could throw all that out the window, and the uproar surrounding Rick Warren's selection would still be ridiculous. Just in case anyone missed it, Barack Obama never supported gay marriage in the first place. Sure, he doesn't believe that homosexuality itself is sinful, or support constitutional amendments banning gay marriage, but when it came to the biggest political issue on the "gay agenda", Obama refused to explicitly give his blessing. Instead, Obama repeatedly expressed his belief that "marriage is between a man and a woman.

This isn't a case of betrayal. This is a case of a mainstream politician who took a mainstream stance on gay marriage and selected a mainstream pastor to say a nice little prayer at his inauguration.

Nothing else.